Neat People Vs. Sloppy People by Britt, P. 217 in 75 Readings
In the essays, Swell People vs. Sloppy People by Suzanne Britt, and Batting Clean-up and Hitting Out by Dave Barry, both authors focus on dissimilar perspectives of dealing with a mess. In particular, Britt is more concerned with comparing people in their views on neatness and sloppiness, whereas Barry pays attention to the fashion clay is perceived by males and females. Additionally, the similarity of both essays lies in highlighting the problem of mess and dirt, likewise as how it perceived by people. However, there are much more differences in terms of topics of give-and-take, presentation of examples, structure and topics. In particular, the authors choose different angles while representing people, particularly when it comes to gender differentiation. There is also a different extent to which both of them refer their personal experience. Finally, the examples also vary in terms of the author's reference to details. With regards to these elements, it should be stressed that Britt'due south essay seems to be more than logical and understandable every bit compared to Barry, in terms of discussion of topics, illustration of examples and structure.
Both essays discuss the topic of dirt, but from dissimilar perspectives. To be more exact, Britt focuses on people's lifestyles and character traits while discussing the difference between neat and sloppy people. Interestingly, she seems to criticize neat people, because they are more concerned with themselves rather than with more important things, like goals in life, self-development, ambitions, and quest for new opportunities. In contrast, she encourages sloppy people who are more than ambitious, because of their extreme interest in details and their aspiration, to achieve new goals and conquer new horizons. In this respect, Britt writes, "Sloppy people carry in their mind's heart a heavenly vision, a precise plan, that is and so stupendous, and so perfect, it tin't be achieved in this world or the next" (220). Although this statement is a humorous analysis of people, the author makes a positive contribution to explaining why some people neglect to be neat. In contrast, Barry makes a statement only at the start of the paper concerning the differences between men and women in terms of their attitude to clay and mess. In item, he notes, "the primary divergence betwixt men and women is that women tin can meet extremely small quantities of dirt" (Barry 203). In fact, both essays are written in a humorous and ironic way, although they represent different perspectives of the topic. Additionally, the topic representation of dirt primarily focuses on the way people consider mess, simply to a different extent. For case, Britt focuses on the mess as a character trait, whereas Barry is more than concerned with gender differentiation. Therefore, Britt'due south essay seems to be clearer and more apparent as compared to the ideas presented in Barry's work. In fact, both authors strive to pay attention to the ways people with dissimilar characters can be analyzed. In fact, fifty-fifty people's attitude to mess and dirt can provide a psychological and gender-based analysis. Indeed, in certain cases, women seem to be neater than men, and therefore, the examples are often relevant to the point. Additionally, people's graphic symbol and actions are often advisable to provide an image of a person who has a certain attitude to clay.
In terms of examples illustration, Britt seems to be less inventive, because all of the writer's examples do not refer to real-to-life situations. On the opposite, they only provide a logical concatenation of justified statements. For instance, when information technology comes to the analysis of character traits, Britt discusses the primary peculiarities of their lifestyles. For instance, when she describes neat people, she refers to their behavior, attitude to other people, and to life opportunities in general. Sloppy people are also described in this way. Then, the description looks like a psychological and behavioral analysis. Although the author sometimes refers to the examples from life, similar mentioning the names of newspapers, the overall description does not have anything common with experience and concrete examples. Indeed, Britt introduces a great number of examples to explain that not bad people are lazy and hateful. For example, she focuses on birthday cards, postcards from Europe, letters and charitable contributions. When information technology comes to Barry's examples, the audience can notice illustrations and representation of the general thesis statement at the beginning of the essay. In particular, illustrations refer to the author's biographical descriptions and experience taken from life. For instance, Barry describes their run across with his wife's friend Maddy, "Nosotros sat around living room and Maddy tried to stimulate a conversation, only we males could not focus our attention on the various suggested topics because we could brutal the Earth Series television and radio broadcast rays" (204). Although the example is a remote explanation of the differences in behavior and perception, the author fails to develop a general statement about the differences between males and females, focusing more on deportment, deeds, and reactions. On the one mitt, this representation could contribute to a better understanding of the perceptions, just it is non supported by the respective conclusion that will allow the audience to sympathize the betoken. Therefore, Britt's essay is still better than Barry'south in terms of examples analysis.
The construction of the essay also differs in terms of the author's style in topic evolution. It should exist mentioned that both authors start with the difference assay for the audience to sympathise how two different people differ in terms of their outlook on dirt. In particular, Britt starts with a general, but clear differentiation betwixt neat and sloppy people and introduces two major points concerning the discrepancies in beliefs and grapheme. Farther comparisons are represented step past step, which implies that the author provides an caption of a particular type in a separate paragraph. For instance, he starts with the analysis of smashing people in the first function of the essay and then slowly moves to the analysis of sloppy people. It should be stressed that neither of the comparisons interfere with each other, which provides a clear understanding and allows the audition to make the respective deductions and conclusions. In dissimilarity, Barry pays attending representing and describing experience; moreover, all of the examples are associated with the writer's life. In other words, the author is more comfy with representing his vision on his relatives and friends in guild to brand more generalized conclusions. Although the essay has a humorous nature, Barry often use the discussion "nosotros" to emphasize the reference to his life, whereas Britt veils the story, although she implicitly assigns herself to a sloppy kind of people. Therefore, Britt is still the leader in a comparative analysis, because his work is structured in a more than efficient and understandable way every bit compared to a floppy and ambiguous representation in Barry's essay.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both essays have managed to uncover the topic in terms of the people's relation to dirt, neatness or mess. In item, Britt is more concerned with the splitting people into neat and sloppy individuals, which also characterize them in other spheres of life, particularly when it comes to goals accomplishment. In dissimilarity, Barry focuses on gender differentiation when he reveals the topic of dirt and the perception of men and women. In fact, Barry is more concerned with the office that clay plays in relationships between men and women. In this respect, Britt focuses on individuals in an isolated context, whereas Barry attains importance to the style this topic is represented in the context of man relationships. One fashion or some other, Britt's essay is more than structured and complete in comparison to Barry's in terms topic representation, examples, and organization. Although Barry focuses on clay and mess, also as how it is perceived past males and females, Britt's representation is clearer and more than credible. This is of detail business to managing the topic of mess while describing character traits. Britt has managed to describe behavior and attitude in more details equally compared to Barry. Further, Britt resorts to multiple examples while describing people, whereas Barry is less concerned with making conclusions from the examples he introduces. Finally, Britt provides a articulate structure in which the statement is represented at the beginning, whereas other paragraphs provide clear information on two types of people. In dissimilarity, Barry makes information technology difficult for the audition to understand the apparent difference between males and females in regard to their attitude to dirt. Besides the essay does not have a logical conclusion. Overall, Britt'due south essay provides a deeper insight into how the essay should be constructed to attain the target audition, whereas Barry's work is less focused on the audience; rather, it is but a mere representation of the author's subjective stance. It should too be stressed that both essays provide a biographical sketch, but to a different extent. In particular, Britt remotely refers to her personal background, whereas Barry discusses his biography in more detail.
Works Cited
- Barry, Dave. Batting Clean-up and Striking Out. n.d. Web. 2 Feb. 2014.
- Britt, Suzanne. Dandy People vs. Sloppy People. n.d. Web. 2 Feb. 2014.
Source: https://dissertationmasters.com/essays/compare-and-contrast-essay/neat-people-vs-sloppy-people-and-batting-clean-up-and-striking-out-analysis-essay.html
0 Response to "Neat People Vs. Sloppy People by Britt, P. 217 in 75 Readings"
Publicar un comentario